- Home
- Recruitment and Admissions
- Policies, Research, and Insights
- Access and Diversity Advocacy
- Active Page: Case Analyses and Guidance
Case Analyses and Guidance
Explore our collection of case briefs and guidance documents to get a deeper understanding of the case history leading up to the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling.
Key Resources, Case Documents, and Materials
Key Resources, Case Documents, and Materials
Download
Questions and Answers Regarding the Supreme Court's Decision
This document provides institutions of higher education with information about the Court’s decision. The DOJ and DOE will continue to address all complaints of race discrimination by applying the relevant legal standards under civil rights statutes and will vigorously enforce civil rights protections, including prohibitions against racial discrimination. We hope you find the Questions and Answers enclosed to be helpful in implementing lawful admissions programs on your campus, consistent with the recent decision.
- 250.26 KB
Download
Resource for K12 School Leaders: Understanding the Supreme Court’s Ruling
Now that the consideration of race as a status or category is no longer permitted in college admissions, colleges are evaluating their policies and considering what adjustments to make to comply with the Supreme Court ruling. It’s important for school counselors to understand the impact of the ruling and to identify next steps students should take on their journey to college.
- 170.7 KB
Link
Webinar: The Shifting Landscape: Navigating the Supreme Court’s Decision on Race in College Admission (July 2023)
Review this recorded session from July 2023 for an analysis of the Supreme Court’s opinions in the SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC cases, including information regarding the enrollment policy and practice implications of those decisions. To access this presentation, use the passcode: access2023!
- Go to Webinar Recording
Students for Fair Admissions v. UNC and Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard
Students for Fair Admissions v. UNC and Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard
Download
Preliminary Guidance Regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC
This preliminary working draft has been developed to provide initial guidance regarding the Supreme Court’s SFFA opinions.
- 337.05 KB
Download
Action Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC Cases: Background and Suggested Messaging
This PDF outlines the key actions every institution can take right now to prepare for the Supreme Court’s ruling. It includes actions around policy, practice, communications, and leadership.
- 194.08 KB
Link
Oral Arguments: Students for Fair Admissions v. University of NC
Listen to the oral arguments for the Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina case.
- Go to Supreme Court
Link
Oral Arguments: Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard
Listen to the oral arguments for the Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard case.
- Go to Supreme Court
Fisher II: Fisher v. University of Texas 2016
Fisher II: Fisher v. University of Texas 2016
Download
The U.S. Supreme Court's Second Ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas
Preliminary questions and answers on the U.S. Supreme Court's Second Ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas decision and its possible implications.
- 357.98 KB
Download
Implications from Fisher II
This document provides key takeaways from the majority opinion and that of the dissent in the Fisher II decision. It also offers a “Guide to Action” for institutions reviewing their mission-driven diversity enrollment goals and practices.
- 527.35 KB
Download
Fisher v. University of Texas: United States Supreme Court Amicus Brief, 2015
An amicus brief filed by the College Board with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the University of Texas and its defense of its admission procedures and processes consistent with the Grutter ruling in 2003.
- 378.1 KB
Fisher I: Fisher v. University of Texas 2013
Fisher I: Fisher v. University of Texas 2013
Download
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal's Second Ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas: Case Analysis
A case analysis following the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ second ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas on July 15, 2014. The decision upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s race-conscious admission policy.
- 803.26 KB
Download
ADC Guide to Planning for Fisher
An Access and Diversity Collaborative policy and communications guide to help higher education institutions and organizations prepare for the United States Supreme Court's Fisher v. University of Texas decision.
- 253.77 KB
Download
Diversity in the Balance, Part I
Key educational principles from amicus briefs filed in Fisher v. University of Texas.
- 181.71 KB
Download
Diversity in the Balance, Part II
Key steps for higher education institutions to consider in preparation for the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Fisher v. University of Texas.
- 218.55 KB
Download
Decision Day: Key Questions Regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in Fisher v. University of Texas
Answers to key questions raised by Fisher v. University of Texas.
- 684.01 KB
Download
Understanding Fisher v. University of Texas
This guide provides higher education leaders with an analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court Fisher decision. It provides brief background on the case, analyzes the decision itself, and frames key takeaways and policy implications for institutions of higher education.
- 1.02 MB
Download
Fisher v. University of Texas: United States Supreme Court Amicus Brief
An amicus brief filed by the College Board with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the University of Texas and its defense of its admission procedures and processes consistent with the Grutter ruling in 2003.
- 439.46 KB
Download
Fisher v. University of Texas Case Summary
A legal update detailing the federal court upholding the University of Texas race-conscious admissions policy as necessary and appropriate to further compelling interests associated with a diverse student body.
- 734.36 KB
Download
Fisher v. the University of Texas: The U.S. Supreme Court Again Takes on College Admissions
A presentation designed to explore the Fisher case and key issues.
- 352.8 KB
Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger
Download
Admissions and Diversity After Michigan: The Next Generation of Legal and Policy Issues
A practical resource for higher education leaders that helps guide institutional decisions regarding diversity and the use of race and ethnicity in the admission selection process.
- 712.88 KB
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action et al. v. Regents of the University of Michigan et al.
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action et al. v. Regents of the University of Michigan et al.
Download
Legal Update: Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action et al. v. Regents of the University of Michigan et al.
A legal update detailing how the federal circuit holds that Michigan’s ban on the consideration of race and gender in public university admissions is unconstitutional because the resulting political structure impermissibly burdens racial minorities.
- 386.97 KB
Download
Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action: Legal Update
A Supreme Court legal update from the ADC that focuses on the Michigan voter initiative that prohibits the consideration of race and gender in public education, employment, and contracting decisions.
- 229.87 KB
Download
Not Black and White: Making Sense of the United States Supreme Court Decisions Regarding Race-Conscious Student Assignment Plans
This resource provides practical guidance for public school districts stemming from U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education.
- 3.85 MB
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
Download
Not Black and White: Making Sense of the United States Supreme Court Decisions Regarding Race-Conscious Student Assignment Plans
This resource provides practical guidance for public school districts stemming from U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education.
- 3.85 MB
Download
Echoes of Bakke: A Fractured Supreme Court Invalidates Two Race-Conscious K-12 Student Assignment Plans but Affirms the Compelling Interest in the Educational Benefits of Diversity
Initial analysis of implications for postsecondary education in the Supreme Court's student assignment decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1.
- 185.82 KB
Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education
Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education
Download
Not Black and White: Making Sense of the United States Supreme Court Decisions Regarding Race-Conscious Student Assignment Plans
This resource provides practical guidance for public school districts stemming from U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education.
- 3.85 MB